Digital Video Forums  

Go Back   Digital Video Forums > Video File Formats > AVI, DivX/Xvid

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10 Mar 2002, 04:23 PM   #1
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 145
Default Divx 4.12 in VirtualDub & Ulead media studio 6.0

1-
VirtualDub (Divx4.12+Mpeg Layer-3)
Lenght: 25:00
Total Frames: 37.500
Aspect Ratio: 320X240
Video Compression: Divx 4.12/1500fps
Audio Compression: Mpeg Layer-3 44.100 khz 96kbps
Final video size: 252.6 Mb
Final audio size: 18.1 Mb
Final movie size: 270.7 Mb
Render Time: 15m 24s


2-
VirtualDub (Divx4.12+Microsoft ADPCM)

Lenght: 25:00
Total Frames: 37.500
Aspect Ratio: 320X240
Video Compression: Divx 4.12/1500fps
Audio Compression: Microsoft ADPCM 44.100 khz 43kbps
Final video size: 252.6 Mb
Final audio size: 64.1 Mb
Final movie size: 316.7 Mb
Render Time: 16m 08s


3-
Ulead Video Editor 6.0 -ulead media studio pro 6.0- (Divx4.12+Microsoft ADPCM)
Lenght: 25:00
Total Frames: 37.500
Aspect Ratio: 320X240
Video Compression: Divx 4.12/1500fps
Audio Compression: Microsoft ADPCM 44.100 khz 43kbps
Final video size: 212.5 Mb
Final audio size: 64.1 Mb
Final movie size: 276.6 Mb
Render Time: 26m 41s


*Someone can explain to me why the incredible difference (40.1Mb) between the size of the videos 2 & 3 (VirtualDub & Ulead video editor) if are using the same codec at same bitrate? The quality of the videos is exactly equally.
Ryo94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 Mar 2002, 07:14 PM   #2
Old member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,417
Default

It's most probably in the way each software handles the encoding jobs differently. There will be differences in this video results, though it's so subtle that the eyes are probably unable to pick a difference. Or perhaps you've not the eyes for it.
Enchanter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 Mar 2002, 04:10 AM   #3
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 145
Talking

Yes can be this, and I'm almost blind to but I take a picture of the first frame of this two videos with the file player of the ATI MMC and can't find to much difference or say that one picture is better than other, and supposing that there is differences, this differences could explain 40mb?
Ryo94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:33 AM.

Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Digital Digest

Visit DivXLand   Visit dvdloc8.com