Tweet
since both versions can be found as stickies in this rebuilder forum, i guess you have seen my guide as well
i was asking if have any short.......seems that don't have...ok.
thank you!
-
oh yes i saw all here and in domm9,they have quality/details but big size too.
i was asking if have any short.......seems that don't have...ok.
thank you!still sending greens(you can't see but can feel)
geriatric rock fan -
another encoder
a new encoder test - judge for yourself:
where do you spot differences to procoder?
and have a guess which encoder we're dealing with here!
(encoding time 179 min)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
no filters were used by the wayLast edited by UncasMS; 26 Nov 2005, 08:21 AM.
Comment
-
if you are comparing here with rb pictures from the first page,
the #4 here is the (really)worse of all.
here this picture is washed and with too bad solarizations.still sending greens(you can't see but can feel)
geriatric rock fanComment
-
i have some more comments and differences i see but i want to wait some more and hopefully read some more replies/guesses/impressionsComment
-
I agree with that. The #4 pic above is too yellow.Originally Posted by jeo
The other pictures look practically identical with very minimal differences.
Whatever the encoder is, It still beats the DVD2One pics. I can't get over the amount of blocking in the first pic.
I think it looks like the Quenc Encoder (probably is CCE though).Comment
-
Originally Posted by nwg
good guess but this is what quenc looks like:
(high quality mode, 2 pass vbr, trellis quantization - encoding time: 225 min)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Last edited by UncasMS; 26 Nov 2005, 08:16 AM.Comment
-
i forgot to post about encoder in the first answer:...this is not from CCE,it's too rought and blocky.new encoder test - judge for yourself:
where do you spot differences to procoder?
and have a guess which encoder we're dealing with here!
maybe rejig(?)still sending greens(you can't see but can feel)
geriatric rock fanComment
-
the rejig results were posted already; they look worse than all the others and you've already replied there:
^_~Last edited by UncasMS; 26 Nov 2005, 08:18 AM.Comment
-
If it isn't Quenc. Then CCE and Procoder is left.Comment
-
no, procoder results were given already and it is not cce
any more guesses?
+++++
one more clue added:
the encoding time was 179 minComment
-
oh my...have hard rain here and the energy was gone when i was posting.
if is not from rejig,cce,procoder,HC....only have the Quenc option.the rejig results were posted already
or you tested something new?(and bad,the last pictures(1 and 2) are horribles too)still sending greens(you can't see but can feel)
geriatric rock fanComment
-
Is it FreeEnc?Comment
-
freenc (frank as i call) is too bad, no news version a long time and aqe(developing in the same(bad)forum) is horrible too.this encoders came from one forum that have more "chat"(bla bla blas) that real work.Last edited by jeo; 26 Nov 2005, 08:39 AM.still sending greens(you can't see but can feel)
geriatric rock fanComment
-
If it isn't CCE then I have no idea. I am not aware of any other encoders that can be used by DVD-RB.
You haven't managed to get TMPGEnc to work have you?Last edited by nwg; 26 Nov 2005, 08:48 AM.Comment
-
not really, but this release is new and has improved very much in the speed departmentor you tested something new?
i have used sapstar's AUTOQMATENC 32b
(i havent used hc in this comparison btw ^_~ - maybe i should add cce and hc as well)Comment
Comment