Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Testing the Benq 1650 and more

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chewy
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2003
    • 18971

    Testing the Benq 1650 and more

    I have been a little bumfuzzled trying to figure out this drive, certain disks
    rip slow, other fast. All good drives slow down with problem areas reading and burning. Part of the error correction and power calibration mechanisms.
    During the breakin period this benq has been learning to burn media, that's
    to be expected, but it's also learning to read media. The first disk it ever saw, was a burned one and I did a transfer test as I intended to use the drive as a reader and scanner primarily. That first graph showed 2 deep V's
    in the first gig.
    To get a handle on this I searched for an old burn on iffy media. A three year old princo should qualify, btw the new cdspeed 4.5 is a heck of a tool.



    here's how the nec 3550 sees it quality wise




    now a transfer/read graph from the nec

  • Chewy
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2003
    • 18971

    #2
    now here's what an LG 4163B has to say about the disk

    Comment

    • Chewy
      Super Moderator
      • Nov 2003
      • 18971

      #3
      Now we let the Benq 1650 do it's thing

      read/transfer test



      and most surprising the quality graph from the Benq!

      Comment

      • Chewy
        Super Moderator
        • Nov 2003
        • 18971

        #4
        Conclusion: way to go Benq!

        truly amazing

        Comment

        • NightTran
          King of Digital Video
          King of Digital Video
          • Aug 2005
          • 4224

          #5
          Benq's way of burning is very funny but make a good sense of how they handling all the diff. media
          sigpic

          Comment

          • Dan
            Digital Video Master
            Digital Video Master
            • Dec 2005
            • 1029

            #6
            Very interesting test results Chewy, thanks. I have the NEC 3550 1Y6 and an LG.
            I have never owned or tried a BenQ but the more I read your threads about them, the more I am tempted to get one!

            Comment

            • NightTran
              King of Digital Video
              King of Digital Video
              • Aug 2005
              • 4224

              #7
              get one, if you can get in comusa, try to get 1640 it hidden under Norwood micro, on top of thebar code number it say DW1640
              sigpic

              Comment

              • Dan
                Digital Video Master
                Digital Video Master
                • Dec 2005
                • 1029

                #8
                Thanks for the info NightTran, I will look into that.

                Comment

                • Chewy
                  Super Moderator
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 18971

                  #9
                  Originally Posted by Dan
                  Very interesting test results Chewy, thanks. I have the NEC 3550 1Y6 and an LG.
                  I have never owned or tried a BenQ but the more I read your threads about them, the more I am tempted to get one!
                  the LG 4163B is the best reader I have ever tested,
                  the nec 3550 is the fastest ripper and good with new disks!
                  they make a good pair, complimenting each others weaknesses
                  Both are excellent burners

                  Comment

                  • NightTran
                    King of Digital Video
                    King of Digital Video
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 4224

                    #10
                    Originally Posted by Chewy
                    the LG 4163B is the best reader I have ever tested,
                    the nec 3550 is the fastest ripper and good with new disks!
                    they make a good pair, complimenting each others weaknesses
                    Both are excellent burners
                    Missing good burner
                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • Dan
                      Digital Video Master
                      Digital Video Master
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 1029

                      #11
                      Yeah, I really like the NEC 3550. My LG is a bit older and not as good as the 4163B. That's a good reason to go by another new burner to play with!

                      Comment

                      • Chewy
                        Super Moderator
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 18971

                        #12
                        the king of Benqdom suggested I repeat the read test and set max speed at 12x for the benq 1650, I also set it for the nec 3550



                        Comment

                        • Dan
                          Digital Video Master
                          Digital Video Master
                          • Dec 2005
                          • 1029

                          #13
                          Does the BenQ scan that much better then the NEC?

                          Could it possilby make a potential "bad area" of the disc appear to be a good scan?

                          Just curious of the different scan results, especially on the Disc Quality, one being a 0, the other a 90.

                          Comment

                          • geno888
                            Digital Video Master
                            Digital Video Master
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 1081

                            #14
                            NEC drives are not completely reliable to do scans. Benq are good scanners. Liteon are better, and plextor are the best (but are also really costly )

                            Comment

                            • Dan
                              Digital Video Master
                              Digital Video Master
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 1029

                              #15
                              Does that mean my NEC may scan a disc quality of 95, when in fact there are suspect areas on that disc?

                              I use my NEC 3550 for all my CD SPEED scans and I trust the quality of the disc based on the results I get. I have noticed that good media produces much better results then poor media. But, I want my scans to be accurate.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              🥰
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎