Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User rating for TMPGEnc

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • admin
    Administrator
    • Nov 2001
    • 8917

    User rating for TMPGEnc

    Please rate this tool (out of 5), and post any comments under this thread.
    90
    5 out of 5
    0%
    49
    4 out of 5
    0%
    27
    3 out of 5
    0%
    8
    2 out of 5
    0%
    2
    1 out of 5
    0%
    2
    0 out of 5
    0%
    2
    Visit Digital Digest and dvdloc8.com, My Blog
  • colsey
    Junior Member
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2001
    • 10

    #2
    Nice and easy

    Excellent prog that seems to do all that is needed - converting, encoding, splitting and joining. Also has good support for addons (can sometimes make conversion times a little lengthy) All in all a good starting place for beginners like me!!!!

    Comment

    • mrbingley
      Junior Member
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2002
      • 9

      #3
      Same for me as a beginner. The programme is not too hard to get to grips with and seems to do all the tasks well.
      I suppose the encoding bit is the bugbear having to wait for hours for it to encode the files.
      I'm thinking of building a machine just for this sole purpose, then I can carry on doing other things on my main PC.
      Chris.

      Comment

      • 1 Smelly Fish
        Super Member
        Super Member
        • Nov 2001
        • 274

        #4
        Great !!! havent had any major problems with it, use v1.2 a to convert and cut..

        Cheers

        Comment

        • Simon T
          Member
          Member
          • Nov 2001
          • 95

          #5
          I don't use this program to convert, I juste use it for the MPGtools. I have to multiplex and cut my VCD's with this programs. I never had any problems with it. It's a very reliable program.
          Still standing... ...also after the forumcrash )

          Comment

          • Danski0
            Junior Member
            Junior Member
            • Oct 2002
            • 24

            #6
            Easy to use, just excellent picture quality! But soooo slow!
            Well my Pentium2 could be the answer to that.... but I also have to say that it does not actually slow down the computer.
            Great program!

            Comment

            • kahlb_be
              Junior Member
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2002
              • 4

              #7
              how to improve picture quality

              Hello,

              I'm editing my own videos with adobe premiere 6 and I'm just wondering how to get as max qualitiy as possible on a DVD.

              Currently I'm using the DIVX5.0 Codec to produce a AVI file and the import this avi file into the TMPG Encoder to create the mpeg2 file.

              Can anybody tell me which TMPG/DIVX5.0 - settings result in best picture quality ?

              Thanks for each post!

              Comment

              • SKD_Tech
                Lord of Digital Video
                Lord of Digital Video
                • Jan 2003
                • 1512

                #8
                Well It does slow down the computer when Priority is Set high because it'll choke out my P4 3.06 GHZ but I must say I can get stuff done with it like that in about an hour and a half

                Comment

                • rsquirell
                  Digital Video Master
                  Digital Video Master
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 1329

                  #9
                  For my 1.4 gig Athlon XP I'm looking at a 17 hour run for a High Quality 2 hour captured video. I can cut that down to 4-5 hours by just selecting the "clip" trim the "noise lines" off the top, bottom and sides (don't have a stand-alone DVD player). The end product is awesome...love the tools...but wish they'd make a patch to accept LPCM (like ULead did for VideoStudio).

                  Comment

                  • SKD_Tech
                    Lord of Digital Video
                    Lord of Digital Video
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1512

                    #10
                    17 hours? What else do you have running in the background because it really should take that long. what I do is I close out everything before I go to bed then I set the priority to high and by the morning it is done

                    Comment

                    • rsquirell
                      Digital Video Master
                      Digital Video Master
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 1329

                      #11
                      Guess that's what your extra 2 gigs gets you...if I just select clip and knock a few lines off the margins I get a 4-5 hr overnite run...if I select noise and high quality video it's a 17hr run...it's why I'm grateful for a 2nd computer.

                      Comment

                      • rsquirell
                        Digital Video Master
                        Digital Video Master
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 1329

                        #12
                        I'm changing my rating for TMPGenc from 4 out of 5 to 5 out of 5. I just learned how to use it to change LPCM audio to PCM AND how to get it to write headers on a headerless video stream. An absolutely Fabulus product. For details see my post "Use TMPGenc to Convert/Render" in the Dazzle DVC-150 General forum. (Go to Dazzle home page...click support...click community forums.) Using TMPGenc I can make copies using the 150 external capture device that's as good as any I've seen made by internal cards.

                        Comment

                        • cd090580
                          Junior Member
                          Junior Member
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 4

                          #13
                          It's simply the best mpeg encoder i've ever try. It gives very good svcd and vcd videos clips. I like this software.

                          Comment

                          • steveng
                            Junior Member
                            Junior Member
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 1

                            #14
                            Renecode an existing mpeg2 using Tmpgenc to reduce the size of the original MPEG2 fil

                            HI there,

                            I have been using the program ReMPEG2 V. 1.52 for about two years with great success, however I am having a problem now . I have edited my own movie in Adobe 6.5 then exported it as MPEG2 which creates a MPEG file of about 6 gig excluding the .wav file of 1.2GB

                            When I look at the MPEG files after I recompressed it in ReMPEG2 down to 3GB the MPEG plays fine but it is only 1 hour and 15 min instead of the original 1 hour and 55 min. When I look at the original Mpeg it is definitely 1hour 55 minutes just like the .wav is.

                            So now I decided to try out TMPGEnc using version 2.520.54.163 which seems far more complicated with all these options than ReMPEG2. I am looking for the option that will allow me to adjust the scale factor for the bit rate. So in my example above I would slide the slider down to 50% in order for my MPEG to reduce in size to 3GB from 6GB Where is the option in TMPGEnc.

                            Another question:

                            I see there is an option ES (video & audio) and system (video & audio) what the difference and will this also compress the .wav file as well as the MPEG2 file? And will it still play fine after I have burn the DVD using Impression pro

                            Thanks for your help
                            -Steven
                            Last edited by steveng; 2 Sep 2003, 09:54 AM.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            😀
                            🥰
                            🤢
                            😎
                            😡
                            👍
                            👎