Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I'll bite

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elizerrojas
    Digital Video Technician
    Digital Video Technician
    • Jan 2005
    • 484

    #31
    just did "Black Snake Moan" with dvd2one V. 2.1.3, i did the whole disc, left the movie soundtrack only and english subs. the actual compression was 43%, i see no difference between the original and the copy in my 36 inch TV. maybe with a larger TV i would, don't know. it took dvd2one about 25 minutes. 43% compression is very high in my view, dvd2one handle it just fine.
    Last edited by elizerrojas; 27 Jun 2007, 07:29 PM.

    Comment

    • photo_angel2004
      Queen of Digital Video
      Queen of Digital Video
      • Jan 2004
      • 3558

      #32
      Originally Posted by locoeng
      I posted a link to the comparisons here Carla...please disregard the encoding quality pics....the link shows both encoders and transcoders as a comparison and I know they are in two separate classes, but the results of the different transcoders can still be seen there side by side. That was my original intent of posting the link, but no one seemed to catch it.
      Looks like I may have to play with this one a bit.
      and thanks for the link to the link LOL.

      @evdberg,
      Thanks for the info






      IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

      Comment

      • locoeng
        Who Farted?
        • Dec 2005
        • 2509

        #33
        You are very welcome Carla


        "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. It's not fair to you and no challenge for us."
        Walt Kelly

        Comment

        • NightTran
          King of Digital Video
          King of Digital Video
          • Aug 2005
          • 4224

          #34
          is dvd2one is really that good less then one hour and creat good quality?

          Thanks
          sigpic

          Comment

          • elizerrojas
            Digital Video Technician
            Digital Video Technician
            • Jan 2005
            • 484

            #35
            Originally Posted by NightTran
            is dvd2one is really that good less then one hour and creat good quality?

            Thanks

            What?

            Comment

            • Chewy
              Super Moderator
              • Nov 2003
              • 18971

              #36
              a translation,
              is dvd2one really that good that it can do a heavy compression is less than an hour without losing quality?

              to test and use the trial version simply chose a video of less than 2 hours and then set your target
              size to custom, say you have 5 gigs of video and 300 megs of audio

              target size of 4.3 would be 80%

              3.3 would be ~60%

              2.8 would be ~50%

              I reduced a 4.2 gig set of files to 3 gigs this morning in a similar test, only took 5 1/2 minutes with my
              lame OC'd xp mobile(@2200)
              Last edited by Chewy; 28 Jun 2007, 05:47 AM.

              Comment

              • Chewy
                Super Moderator
                • Nov 2003
                • 18971

                #37
                I pushed it a little further with a higher quality set of files
                1hr 35 min at 4.2 gigs

                3.9gigs video x .6

                after adding back the audio I set size to 2700 MB
                using a system that 50% faster it took a little over 7 minutes

                other programs would take an hour

                I really could not tell any difference in this ~60% compression, maybe a slight fuzziness on faster motion video

                Comment

                • elizerrojas
                  Digital Video Technician
                  Digital Video Technician
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 484

                  #38
                  So, it seems that we finally have a program that achieves both, speed while producing quality output as that of (or near to)shrink and recode2.

                  Comment

                  • Chewy
                    Super Moderator
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 18971

                    #39
                    my next test will be to lower ouptut size to 2200MB
                    that should be equivalent to 54% compression from my original test of the whole video which was 3 hrs long

                    I expect to see a dramatic increase in time with some video degradation
                    My original test with the other program took over 2 hours for high quality
                    output

                    Comment

                    • locoeng
                      Who Farted?
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 2509

                      #40
                      I batch encoded season two of Deadwood...the first disc was only 29% compression, full disc only removed foreign audio and subs and kept menus etc. Didn't check the other discs, but they each had more content (extra episode each disc). It took and hour to do all four discs...I will burn the results onto discs tonight and check the quality.


                      "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. It's not fair to you and no challenge for us."
                      Walt Kelly

                      Comment

                      • Chewy
                        Super Moderator
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 18971

                        #41
                        well test 2 is complete, dvd2one only took 7 and 1/2 minutes to compress the 4.2 gig original to 2.3 gigs and the output showed very little degradation in quality, I then tested the other program with the same output size and no extra quality settings, it took 8 1/2 minutes and the output was unacceptable.

                        I hate to be a doubting thomas here but seeing is believing, loco's link didn't really show me enough detail to see any significant differences.

                        Comment

                        • photo_angel2004
                          Queen of Digital Video
                          Queen of Digital Video
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 3558

                          #42
                          Originally Posted by Chewy
                          well test 2 is complete, dvd2one only took 7 and 1/2 minutes to compress the 4.2 gig original to 2.3 gigs and the output showed very little degradation in quality, I then tested the other program with the same output size and no extra quality settings, it took 8 1/2 minutes and the output was unacceptable.

                          I hate to be a doubting thomas here but seeing is believing, loco's link didn't really show me enough detail to see any significant differences.



                          Good morning chewy,

                          Have you tested this with a larger file size yet?

                          I may have to give this a try with a 4 hour flick and see how it does with time and quality.






                          IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

                          Comment

                          • locoeng
                            Who Farted?
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 2509

                            #43
                            Maybe we could get our own screen capture comparison thread going here..


                            "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. It's not fair to you and no challenge for us."
                            Walt Kelly

                            Comment

                            • Chewy
                              Super Moderator
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 18971

                              #44
                              it's not going to make any difference what size file set you start with, the trial is limited to 2 hours of video tho

                              all I was trying to do a perform a test anyone could duplicate before buying the registered version

                              4 hours is overdoing it tho, even a full encoder would drop the ball

                              3 hours is pushing the programs limits

                              loco, I wouldn't suggest that

                              Comment

                              • photo_angel2004
                                Queen of Digital Video
                                Queen of Digital Video
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 3558

                                #45
                                Originally Posted by Chewy
                                it's not going to make any difference what size file set you start with, the trial is limited to 2 hours of video thoall I was trying to do a perform a test anyone could duplicate before buying the registered version

                                4 hours is overdoing it tho, even a full encoder would drop the ball

                                3 hours is pushing the programs limits

                                loco, I wouldn't suggest that
                                Thanks for that info chewy,

                                Looks like I wont be trying that anytime soon, If I cant try it with what I want it for then the FREE trial is 100% useless. good to know now I wont bother downloading the free trial after all.
                                I will stick with what I have for the time being.






                                IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎