Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Blu-Ray vs. DVD - "picture quality"

  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default Blu-Ray vs. DVD - "picture quality"

    It is very hard to find any "real world" comparison or telling pictures of how a Blu-Ray movie may look like compared to DVD material.

    It does not only require player and identical movies in both formats - the tricky part was "how can I capture a screenshot?"

    Well, I'm not going to say it was easy and of course I'm not going to say the way I decided to go is a proper one but I do hope the results may be of some use to you.

    I used a Blu-Ray and a normal DVD player (without UPSCALER!), used two movies on Blu-Ray as well as DVD and put my digital SLR camera on a tripod for the "screenshots".


    The following was used:

    TV:
    - LG 42" lcd - 42lg5000

    Player:
    - Samsung BD 1500
    (borrowed this player and was amazed that this model was able to do way more than it was supposed to in terms of what the manufacturer says in the manual AND the homepage infos!
    This BD 1500 WAS able to play avi files although manual and pdf say it was NOT able to.
    This BD 1500 was able to play DVD+R / DVD+RW although a sticker on top of the player said that it was NOT able to [sticker did not specify wether DVD+R referred to blank media or book type so i tested all and it played all *g*
    so it is all in all a matter of latest firmware update for the BD 1500!)

    - LG DVX 276

    Movies:
    - Kung Fu Panda Blu-Ray
    - Kung Fu Panda DVD
    - Mutant Chronicles Blu-Ray
    - Mutant Chronicles DVD

    - Mamma Mia DVD

    Screenshots :
    - Canon EOS 30d
    - Canon EF 100 mm macro
    - Benro tripod


    Please keep in mind that the movies were paused and of course a "still" image is different to what you are able to recognice when 24-30 frames per second move by on your TV screen.

    My visual impression is this:

    - you spot more details with blu-ray material on the tv but NOT as much as you will be able to see in the fololwing still images!

    - you still get a very good image when playing NORMAL DVDs on a proper player; dont let the industry tell you blu-ray is out of this world as opposed to dvd!

    - dvd material played with a player which has an UPSCALER makes a big difference when using a larger tv

    - the sound formats TrueHD and DTS-Master are NOT that much better than good 5.1 DD or DTS signals - they are hardly more than uncompressed formats and imho no reason at all to change your system or buy a certain product just because of these features
    (i do have 8 speakers connected to my onkyo btw so i'm not talking about the sound that may come from the tv)


    keep in mind that when you look at these full resolution pix of my camera in 100% full format on your monitor you will see way more details and therefore differences compared to watching a moving images on a 42" or so tv.
    with a full format picture like these you should and would normally have a much larger viewing distance and then those details will NOT be as clearly visible any more!

    or does anyone sit in front of a 42" tv with a viewing distance of only 2 m or less?
    i hope not


    ++++

    the file names will tell you if it was dvd or blu-ray material on either the samsung blu-ray bd 1500 or the normal dvd lg w/out upscaler
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by UncasMS; 14 Feb 2009 at 11:21 PM

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default part 2

    part 2
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #3
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default part 3

    part 3
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by UncasMS; 17 Jan 2009 at 11:04 PM

  4. #4
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default part 4

    part 4
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    8,701

    Default

    Great work!

  6. #6
    Platinum Member
    Platinum Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    No Idea
    Posts
    177

    Default

    I must say that it is very similar.
    But for the panda one i like the bly ray much more.
    Birthdays are good. Statistics show that the people who have the most live the longest .

  7. #7
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default

    in my still pictures you are able to see much more details - true

    but with a movie playing 24-30 fps you will NOT see all those lovely little details as precisely as you do now - that was my experience

  8. #8
    He is coming to your little town! BR7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sioux City,IA
    Posts
    2,137

    Default

    In my experience watching Blu-rays and going back to watch the very same movie on DVD,I think that DVDs have a hazy blur look to them,not to mention pixlation on black images.

    Why not post comparisons on movies like

    2001 Space Odyssey
    The Godfather
    Halloween
    Evil Dead II
    Nightmare on Elm Street
    The Cowboys
    Blazing Saddles
    Blade Runner
    All the old Bond films and so on

  9. #9
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BR7 View Post
    ...not to mention pixlation on black images.
    leads me to azume that the chip of the player is not doing a good job when it comes to upscaling capabilities or was it not even played from the same player you are referring to when talking about the blu-ray quality?

    i normally do not have artefacts when watching dvds

    Why not post comparisons on movies like

    2001 Space Odyssey
    The Godfather
    Halloween
    Evil Dead II
    Nightmare on Elm Street
    The Cowboys
    Blazing Saddles
    Blade Runner
    All the old Bond films and so on
    you're more than welcome to do so

    talking about bond: the remastered editon is a quantum leap for both sound and image quality

    have not seen them on blu-ray though

  10. #10
    He is coming to your little town! BR7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sioux City,IA
    Posts
    2,137

    Default

    leads me to azume that the chip of the player is not doing a good job when it comes to upscaling capabilities or was it not even played from the same player you are referring to when talking about the blu-ray quality?
    I didnt mean all movies,I notice it on some of the bigger ones like King Kong. I do see a all DVds being hazy though

    you're more than welcome to do so
    I would love to ,but my camera isn't good enough
    Last edited by BR7; 19 Jan 2009 at 10:06 AM

  11. #11
    Lord of Digital Video
    Lord of Digital Video

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,500

    Talking

    Hi folks,

    Great Work UncasMS!

    As far as I am concern ... they can keep their Blu-Ray ... from day one I just could not see the Hype on HD and or Blu-ray ... I am Fat, Dumb & Happy with plain old DVDs. Matter of a fact I am still on my 36" Panasonic ... and knock on the woods still going strong.

    And who needs 25 to 50GBs of additional stuff. I guess it was needed to keep more people employed.

    G!

  12. #12
    Eclectician MilesAhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,615

    Default

    I wonder if there's a "Blu-Ray review" site that critiques the quality on these releases? With some films if there exists a great source they can work from then the Blu-Ray can be much richer. But on some I have to wonder if they just take the DVD and upconvert it to blow up the bit rate? As example, I have the 16x9 "hip hop" DVD of the Jet Li Black Mask movie. I saw the Blu-Ray version and it sure looks like they just upconverted the DVD9.

    If the Blu-Ray is going to be as fuzzy as the DVD9 it would be great if there was a site that saved the wasted effort by warning us off particular releases.

    Sorry if it's semi-off-topic.

  13. #13
    Super Moderator
    UncasMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    9,047

    Default

    simply buying BD in fact does not guarantee better/decent quality.

    on www.blu-ray.com you will find reviews and you should be able to get an idea of how good picture and sound quality will be

  14. #14
    Eclectician MilesAhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,615

    Default

    Thanks.

  15. #15
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    8,701

    Default

    Yes, blu-ray.com is a very good resource, especially for those not living in the US/Canada to check region status of releases (as verified by real users).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •